Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest'
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: hlinnaka@iki.fi
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-05T14:55:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: > I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see > last paragraph at > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php. Mmm, ok. I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support