Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest'

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: hlinnaka@iki.fi
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-05T14:55:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see
> last paragraph at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php.

Mmm, ok.

I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master
disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from
the newly promoted standby.  Well we have to reconnect manually in this
case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps?

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support