Horton

Re: Sync Rep Design

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

View thread
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, greg@2ndQuadrant.com, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-04T22:24:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org> writes:
>> What about the HBA here?
>
> Hmmm.  That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC?  But that
> doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it
> off synch rep".
>
> I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA.  making DBAs set things
> independantly in two places just frustrates our users.

I was just thinking that you could prepend a reject line at the right
place in the file.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support