Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-19T21:08:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Remember that we're talking about REASSIGN OWNED here, which will
> automatically reassign not only the extension itself, but also the
> contained objects.  There is no danger that we will end up with an
> inconsistent installation.  Also, if the objects in the extension have
> been manually given to someone else, they will stay owned by that other
> user, precisely because the code as written does not recurse.

Oh, right, I forgot the scope of the command. Given those bits of missed
context, +1 from me here. Sorry about missing that in my previous email.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support