Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-19T21:08:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Remember that we're talking about REASSIGN OWNED here, which will > automatically reassign not only the extension itself, but also the > contained objects. There is no danger that we will end up with an > inconsistent installation. Also, if the objects in the extension have > been manually given to someone else, they will stay owned by that other > user, precisely because the code as written does not recurse. Oh, right, I forgot the scope of the command. Given those bits of missed context, +1 from me here. Sorry about missing that in my previous email. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support