Re: Extension Packaging

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, "pgsql-hackers\@postgresql.org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
Date: 2011-05-12T07:29:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Okay, how we add a "revision" key to the control file and extrevision to
>> the pg_extension catalog. Its type can be "TEXT" and is optional for use
>> by extensions.
>
> How would pg_extension.extrevision be kept up to date?  AFAICS, the
> whole point is that you might swap out the shared libraries without
> doing anything at the SQL level.

Well, ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE could be taught to check for control file
changes only when there's no upgrade script.  I think it already did
that for some fields, like require and comment, but it's no longer the
case.

Still, I would think that it should be possible to update some metadata
of the extension without running an SQL upgrade script.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support