Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-21T07:33:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires? Here's a
> simple example:

I don't see what it buys us in this very context. The main thing here to
realize is that I wrote about no code to parse the control file. I don't
think the extension patch should depend on the JSON-in-core patch.

Now, once we have JSON and before the release, I guess given a good
reason to have much more complex configuration files that don't look at
all like postgresql.conf, we could revisit.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support