Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-21T07:33:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires? Here's a > simple example: I don't see what it buys us in this very context. The main thing here to realize is that I wrote about no code to parse the control file. I don't think the extension patch should depend on the JSON-in-core patch. Now, once we have JSON and before the release, I guess given a good reason to have much more complex configuration files that don't look at all like postgresql.conf, we could revisit. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support