Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-05T16:58:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Examining this thread, I think there is insufficient consensus to push > this patch into 9.2. It's not entirely clear that this patch isn't > what we want, but it's not entirely clear that it is what we want > either, and I think it's too late in the release cycle to push > anything into the release that we're not fairly sure we actually want, > because there won't be time to revisit that decision before this ends > up out in the wild. It's also not the sort of thing we can just whack > around in the next release if we get it wrong, because APIs for coping > with versioning are exactly the kind of thing that you can't go change > at the drop of a hat. I'm therefore marking this Returned with > Feedback. Fair enough I guess. The first extension patch took me more than 2 years∫of brewing before we get to a consensus on what we wanted in core, I shouldn't have assumed it would ease the path for next improvements too much. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support