Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-13T18:41:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I think it's better to keep it working as a textual substitution.
> That poses the least risk of breaking scripts that work today ---
> who's to say that somebody might not be relying on the substitution
> happening someplace else than CREATE FUNCTION's shlib string?

Fair enough, I suppose.  So +1 from me, FWIW.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support