Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-13T18:41:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > I think it's better to keep it working as a textual substitution. > That poses the least risk of breaking scripts that work today --- > who's to say that somebody might not be relying on the substitution > happening someplace else than CREATE FUNCTION's shlib string? Fair enough, I suppose. So +1 from me, FWIW. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support