Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2010-05-06T14:09:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > It would be easier to implement a conflict resolution plugin that is > called when a conflict occurs, allowing users to have a customisable > mechanism. Again, I have no objection to that proposal. To implement, if you say so, no doubt. To use, that means you need to install a contrib module after validation that the trade offs there are the one you're interested into, or you have to code it yourself. In C. I don't see that as an improvement over what we have now. Our main problem seems to be the documentation of the max_standby_delay, where we give the impression it's doing things the code can not do. IIUC. Regards, -- dim