Re: wCTE behaviour

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-11-13T19:12:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> It's not that straighforward though, in that the producer could stop a
> bit ahead of what the consumer reads, due to there being a buffer in the
> middle.  Witness this simple example

Yeah, another example where the analogy fails for us.
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support