Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>, Joe Abbate <jma@freedomcircle.com>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg@alleroedderne.adsl.dk>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2011-05-31T20:11:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011: >> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus >> that they would rather use this URL for the above message: >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.GA16741@wolff.to > > Yeah, I keep dreaming that one day we will get rid of the silly monthly > partitioning of archives. Those URLs will eventually be legacy -- > existing ones will continue to work, but new messages will not (may not) > get them any longer. Check out the following POC, which needs to get migrated into a django application for the upcoming new infrastructure: http://archives.beccati.org/ It uses AOX (http://aox.org/) and as such is baked by a PostgreSQL database. The mails threading view is even a CTE. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support