Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, "pgsql-hackers\@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Date: 2013-06-10T15:19:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > While having one place to put everything sounds great, it doesn't do a > whole lot of good if you consider conflicts- either because you want > multiple versions available or because there just happens to be some > overlap in function names (or similar). There are also extensions which > have more than just functions in them but also tables, which increases > the chances of a conflict happening. Having the extension authors end > up having to prefix everything with the name of the extension to avoid > conflicts would certainly be worse than actually using schemas. Now you're not talking about *default* settings anymore, or are you? Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
Commits
-
Extend and improve use of EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS.
- 4ae5ee6c9b4d 9.3.0 cited
-
Remove misplaced sanity check from heap_create().
- a475c6036752 9.3.0 cited
-
Silently ignore any nonexistent schemas that are listed in search_path.
- 880bfc3287dd 9.2.0 cited