Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>
> Going toward >8k tuples would be really good, but I suspect we may
> some difficulties with LO stuffs once we implement it. Also it seems
> that it's not worth to adapt LOs with newly designed tuples.  I think
> the design of current LOs are so broken that we need to redesign them.
>
> [... LO stuff deleted ...]

    I  wasn't  talking  about  a new datatype that can exceed the
    tuple limit. The general tuple split I want will also  handle
    it  if  a row with 40 text attributes of each 1K gets stored.
    That's something different.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #