Thread

1. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

   Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 1999-05-12T15:20:52Z

   jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
   >> Perhaps this could be driven by a configuration switch?
   
   >     Or maybe some switch to initdb and createdb?
   
   That's a good idea; it would save having to propagate the value out of
   configure and into the places where it'd be needed.
   
   			regards, tom lane
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] plpgsql error

   Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com> — 1999-05-12T15:58:16Z

   >
   > jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
   > >> Perhaps this could be driven by a configuration switch?
   >
   > >     Or maybe some switch to initdb and createdb?
   >
   > That's a good idea; it would save having to propagate the value out of
   > configure and into the places where it'd be needed.
   
       I've thought a little more about that one and I don't like it
       anymore. It's a bad idea that enabling a language in  such  a
       looser-friendly  way is only possible during db creation, not
       for existing databases.
   
       I'll remove that from initdb again and instead  add  two  new
       utilities  "installpl"  and  "removepl".  That  way it's also
       possible to automate the process in  scripts  but  it  is  as
       flexible as can.
   
   
   Jan
   
   --
   
   #======================================================================#
   # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
   # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
   #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #