Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com>
From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at, jwieck@debis.com, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-02-19T19:02:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are
> backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
>
> The problem being that it appears that 'copy' overrides/ignores
> the rewrite rules, which kind of invalidates having them, doesn't it?
> What would it take to have copy follow them as select does?
Copy does a heap scan by itself. Doesn't care about rules.
Instead copy must do a SELECT internal. Don't know if that
is really what copy should do.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #