Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)

Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com>

From: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
To: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: scrappy@hub.org, Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at, jwieck@debis.com, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-02-19T19:45:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > > 	Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place?  It sounds to me like we are
> > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > > 
> > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> > 
> > 	Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
> 
> Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?

    Don't think so - not really hard tested.

> 
> -- 
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
> 


Jan

-- 

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #