Re: pessimal trivial-update performance
PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
From: "Pierre C" <lists@peufeu.com>
To: "Jesper Krogh" <jesper@krogh.cc>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-07-05T10:11:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> The problem can generally be written as "tuples seeing multiple > updates in the same transaction"? > > I think that every time PostgreSQL is used with an ORM, there is > a certain amount of multiple updates taking place. I have actually > been reworking clientside to get around multiple updates, since they > popped up in one of my profiling runs. Allthough the time I optimized > away ended being both "roundtrip time" + "update time", but having > the database do half of it transparently, might have been sufficient > to get me to have had a bigger problem elsewhere.. > > To sum up. Yes I think indeed it is a real-world case. > > Jesper On the Python side, elixir and sqlalchemy have an excellent way of handling this, basically when you start a transaction, all changes are accumulated in a "session" object and only flushed to the database on session commit (which is also generally the transaction commit). This has multiple advantages, for instance it is able to issue multiple-line statements, updates are only done once, you save a lot of roundtrips, etc. Of course it is most of the time not compatible with database triggers, so if there are triggers the ORM needs to be told about them.