Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli.khodorkovskiy@crunchydata.com>,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-05-23T14:17:50Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 2019-05-19 04:10, Andres Freund wrote: >> (I'm also getting annoyed that Peter, as the original author of this >> commit, isn't doing anything about the issue.) > > Yea, I'm confused / annoyed about that too. I was traveling, and the subject line didn't yell "problem with beta1". >> I wouldn't be totally opposed to un-reverting after beta1, if a >> better-tested patch emerges. But we don't have such a patch today >> and I don't see how we'll get there this weekend. > > Right. I think if somebody puts some elbow grease into that that'd be a > reasonable course. But so far Peter's not showing up, so ... After rereading the entire discussion, I don't have much enthusiasm for trying to fix this for PG12. It's worth trying again in the future. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Rearrange postmaster's startup sequence for better syslogger results.
- 9a86f03b4e8c 13.0 landed
-
Improve logrotate test so that it meaningfully exercises syslogger.
- 9d5c22d28f8c 12.0 landed
-
Revert "postmaster: Start syslogger earlier".
- 833451552925 12.0 landed
-
postmaster: Start syslogger earlier
- 57431a911d3a 12.0 cited