Re: GUC parameter ACLs and physical walsender
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Date: 2026-06-18T18:52:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2026-06-18 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It looks to me like the existing branches all assign OID 10097 > to type pg_parameter_acl. Could we get away with writing > BKI_ROWTYPE_OID(10097,ParameterAclRelation_Rowtype_Id) > in the back branches? It'd depend on whether there are any > build options that change how many OIDs get assigned before > this one, but if there aren't ... Interesting idea. > It might not be worth taking any risk for, though, given the > lack of field reports. That's what I was thinking. If someone is really stuck, there's an easy workaround, just do a non-replication connection and "SELECT 1" first. Regards, Jeff Davis
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Nail pg_parameter_acl in relcache.
- 4cc02b80774e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
catcache.c: use C_COLLATION_OID for texteqfast/texthashfast.
- dbf217c1c7c2 19 (unreleased) cited