Re: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-07-24T18:26:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 24.07.24 20:09, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut<peter@eisentraut.org> writes: >> On 24.07.24 16:05, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I'm not very thrilled with these changes. It's not apparent why >>> your compiler is warning about these usages of IsA and not any other >>> ones, >> I think one difference is that normally IsA is called on a Node * (since >> you call IsA to decide what to cast it to), but in this case it's called >> on a pointer that is already of type ErrorSaveContext *. > Hmm. But there are boatloads of places where we call IsA on a > pointer of type Expr *, or sometimes other things. Why aren't > those triggering the same warning? It must have to do with the fact that the escontext field in JsonExprState has the object inline, not as a pointer. AIUI, with dynamically allocated objects you have more liberties about what type to interpret them as than with actually declared objects. If you change the member to a pointer - ErrorSaveContext escontext; + ErrorSaveContext *escontext; } JsonExprState; and make the required adjustments elsewhere in the code, the warning goes away. This arrangement would also appear to be more consistent with other executor nodes (e.g., ExprState, ExprEvalStep), so it might be worth it for consistency in any case.
Commits
-
Fix a strict aliasing violation
- 2fcc5a715130 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add input function for data type pg_ndistinct
- 44eba8f06e55 19 (unreleased) cited