Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-01-18T09:15:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 16:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:00:50PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Maybe (all?) the clarification the docs need is to say:
> > "Partitioned tables are not *themselves* processed by autovacuum."
> 
> Yes, I think the lack of autovacuum needs to be specifically mentioned
> since most people assume autovacuum handles _all_ statistics updating.
> 
> Can someone summarize how bad it is we have no statistics on partitioned
> tables?  It sounds bad to me.

Andrey Lepikhov had an example earlier in this thread[1].  It doesn't take
an exotic query. 

Attached is a new version of my patch that tries to improve the wording.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

 [1]: https://postgr.es/m/3df5c68b-13aa-53d0-c0ec-ed98e6972e2e%40postgrespro.ru

Commits

  1. doc: Fix typo in ANALYZE documentation

  2. Document autoanalyze limitations for partitioned tables

  3. Revert analyze support for partitioned tables

  4. Describe (auto-)analyze behavior for partitioned tables