Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Haas
<robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-12-08T19:35:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/04/2016 07:21 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote: >> As there was a feedback from others related to the patch and doesn't find >> any >> update from author. >> >> Closed in 2016-11 commitfest with "returned with feedback" status. >> Please feel free to update the status once you submit the updated patch or >> if the current status doesn't reflect the actual status of the patch. > > Having a consensus here is already a great step forward. I am sure > that a new version will be sent for the next CF. > Please let's make sure this gets done for 10. We're planning on breaking a lot of config things in 10, so it would be MUCH easier on users if we do the recovery.conf changes in that version as well. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)