Re: proposal: schema variables

Gilles Darold <gilles.darold@dalibo.com>

From: Gilles Darold <gilles.darold@dalibo.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-01T22:13:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Move WAL sequence code into its own file

  2. Add ExplainState argument to pg_plan_query() and planner().

  3. Don't include access/htup_details.h in executor/tuptable.h

  4. Refactor to avoid code duplication in transformPLAssignStmt.

  5. Avoid including commands/dbcommands.h in so many places

  6. Restrict psql meta-commands in plain-text dumps.

  7. Split func.sgml into more manageable pieces

  8. Fix squashing algorithm for query texts

  9. EXPLAIN: Always use two fractional digits for row counts.

  10. Preliminary refactoring of plpgsql expression construction.

  11. plpgsql: pure parser and reentrant scanner

  12. Add some sanity checks in executor for query ID reporting

  13. Fix misleading error message context

  14. Add macros for looping through a List without a ListCell.

Le 01/11/2017 à 05:15, Pavel Stehule a écrit :
>
>
> 2017-10-31 22:28 GMT+01:00 srielau <serge@rielau.com
> <mailto:serge@rielau.com>>:
>
>     Pavel,
>
>     There is no
>     DECLARE TEMP CURSOR
>     or
>     DECLARE TEMP variable in PLpgSQL
>     and
>
>
> sure .. DECLARE TEMP has no sense, I talked about similarity DECLARE
> and CREATE TEMP
>
>
>     CREATE TEMP TABLE has a different meaning from what I understand you
>     envision for variables.
>
>     But maybe I'm mistaken. Your original post did not describe the entire
>     syntax:
>     CREATE [TEMP] VARIABLE [IF NOT EXISTS] name AS type
>       [ DEFAULT expression ] [[NOT] NULL]
>       [ ON TRANSACTION END { RESET | DROP } ]
>       [ { VOLATILE | STABLE } ];
>
>     Especially the TEMP is not spelled out and how its presence affects or
>     doesn't ON TRANSACTION END.
>     So may be if you elaborate I understand where you are coming from.
>
>
> TEMP has same functionality (and implementation) like our temp tables
> - so at session end the temp variables are destroyed, but it can be
> assigned to transaction.

Oh ok, I understand thanks for the precision.

-- 
Gilles Darold
Consultant PostgreSQL
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org