Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
Cynthia Shang <cynthia.shang@crunchydata.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-27T23:03:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/26/17 2:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > I do not think it can be right to rename the directory and not > anything else. I think this is the root of the confusion. A lot of people apparently consented to renaming pg_xlog with the understanding that that's it, whereas other people understood it as consensus for renaming everything. You really have (at least) three options here: 1. Rename nothing 2. Rename directory only 3. Rename everything and you need to count the votes of each pair separately. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Remove all references to "xlog" from SQL-callable functions in pg_proc.
- 806091c96f9b 10.0 landed
-
Replace pg_shadow and pg_group by new role-capable catalogs pg_authid
- 7762619e9527 8.1.0 cited