Re: Reduce planning time for large NOT IN lists containing NULL
Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>
From: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>
To: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-02-23T17:47:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/20/26 17:22, David Geier wrote: > It seems like we don't have a regression test which has a NULL value in > the NOT IN list. Maybe you can find a good place to add that one? There are already regression tests covering NOT IN with NULL values in expressions.sql. Do you think we need an additional simple case, or is the current coverage sufficient? -- Best regards, Ilia Evdokimov, Tantor Labs LLC, https://tantorlabs.com/
Commits
-
Short-circuit row estimation in NOT IN containing NULL consts
- c95cd2991f1e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move planner row-estimation tests to new planner_est.sql
- 374a6394c6ae 19 (unreleased) landed