Horton
Menu

Thread

  1. testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> — 2010-02-18T21:25:35Z

    When accidentally running pg_dump from an 8.4.2 instance into a 9.0devel (cvs as of 2010.02.17)
slave as below, this causes a PANIC.  The slave can be restarted.

localhost:55432 => 8.4.2 instance (ssh tunnel)
/tmp:7575 => a 9.0devel standby

time pg_dump -h localhost -p 55432 -t public.tab_jobs --clean --no-owner --no-privileges ms | psql
-q -h /tmp -p 7575 -d replicas
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
server closed the connection unexpectedly
        This probably means the server terminated abnormally
        before or while processing the request.
connection to server was lost

real    0m5.569s


After re-starting the slave, its logfile shows this:

[...]
STATEMENT:  ALTER TABLE ONLY tab_jobs ALTER COLUMN db SET STATISTICS 10000;
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
STATEMENT:  CREATE SEQUENCE tab_jobs_id_seq
	    START WITH 1
	    INCREMENT BY 1
	    NO MINVALUE
	    NO MAXVALUE
	    CACHE 1;
ERROR:  transaction is read-only
STATEMENT:  ALTER SEQUENCE tab_jobs_id_seq OWNED BY tab_jobs.id;
PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
STATEMENT:  SELECT pg_catalog.setval('tab_jobs_id_seq', 31907, true);
LOG:  server process (PID 25753) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
LOG:  terminating any other active server processes
LOG:  database system was interrupted while in recovery at log time 2010-02-18 16:38:39 CET
HINT:  If this has occurred more than once some data might be corrupted and you might need to
choose an earlier recovery target.
cp: cannot stat `/var/data1/pg_stuff/dump/hotslave/replication_archive/0000000100000088000000E7':
No such file or directory
LOG:  entering standby mode
LOG:  redo starts at 88/E500E4E8
LOG:  consistent recovery state reached at 89/2C800000
LOG:  database system is ready to accept read only connections
[...]


It doesn't happen with just any table (I tried that), so maybe it has some connection with this
specific table, sequence, or sequence name.


There is another (500 GB) replication connection running from a 9.0devel primary to this same
9.0devel slave; the slave seems to pick up that work OK after the restart.  I want to mention that
here, but I don't think it causes/influences this panic.

And to be clear: I realize that one cannot expect a pg_dump at a slave to work: I only did this
accidentally.  Nevertheless, ISTM it shouldn't PANIC...

hth,

Erik Rijkers

  2. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> — 2010-02-18T22:08:50Z

    Erik Rijkers wrote:

> And to be clear: I realize that one cannot expect a pg_dump at a slave to work:

Hmm, why not?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

  3. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> — 2010-02-18T22:13:19Z

    On Thu, February 18, 2010 23:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>> And to be clear: I realize that one cannot expect a pg_dump at a slave to work:
>
> Hmm, why not?

Because the slave is readonly.

My case was:

   pg_dump $pg8.4.2 | psql $slave

I ran this by accident.


I suppose I should have written more clearly:

  "one cannot expect throwing a pg_dump at a slave to work"



Erik Rijkers

  4. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2010-02-18T22:32:14Z

    On Thursday 18 February 2010 22:25:35 Erik Rijkers wrote:
> When accidentally running pg_dump from an 8.4.2 instance into a 9.0devel
> (cvs as of 2010.02.17) slave as below, this causes a PANIC.  The slave can
> be restarted.
> 
> localhost:55432 => 8.4.2 instance (ssh tunnel)
> /tmp:7575 => a 9.0devel standby
> 
> time pg_dump -h localhost -p 55432 -t public.tab_jobs --clean --no-owner
> --no-privileges ms | psql -q -h /tmp -p 7575 -d replicas
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>         This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>         before or while processing the request.
> connection to server was lost
> 
> real    0m5.569s
> 
> 
> After re-starting the slave, its logfile shows this:
> 
> [...]
> STATEMENT:  ALTER TABLE ONLY tab_jobs ALTER COLUMN db SET STATISTICS 10000;
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> STATEMENT:  CREATE SEQUENCE tab_jobs_id_seq
> 	    START WITH 1
> 	    INCREMENT BY 1
> 	    NO MINVALUE
> 	    NO MAXVALUE
> 	    CACHE 1;
> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
> STATEMENT:  ALTER SEQUENCE tab_jobs_id_seq OWNED BY tab_jobs.id;
> PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
> STATEMENT:  SELECT pg_catalog.setval('tab_jobs_id_seq', 31907, true);
Hm, yea. setval() simply misses a check there (it was added for nextval 
though).
I wonder if there are other functions bypassing the layers like 
setval/nextval?

Trivial patch attached.

Andres

  5. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2010-02-19T06:30:46Z

    Andres Freund wrote:
> Trivial patch attached.

Thanks, committed.

-- 
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

  6. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> — 2010-02-19T11:52:54Z

    On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:13 +0100, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> I ran this by accident

Good test, thanks for running it.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

  7. Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - PANIC: cannot make new WAL entries during recovery

    Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> — 2010-02-19T15:33:43Z

    On Thu, February 18, 2010 23:32, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Thursday 18 February 2010 22:25:35 Erik Rijkers wrote:

>> localhost:55432 => 8.4.2 instance (ssh tunnel)
>> /tmp:7575 => a 9.0devel standby
>>
>> time pg_dump -h localhost -p 55432 -t public.tab_jobs --clean --no-owner
>> --no-privileges ms | psql -q -h /tmp -p 7575 -d replicas
>> ERROR:  transaction is read-only
[...]
>> PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
>> server closed the connection unexpectedly
>>         This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>>         before or while processing the request.
>> connection to server was lost
>>
[...]
>> STATEMENT:  ALTER SEQUENCE tab_jobs_id_seq OWNED BY tab_jobs.id;
>> PANIC:  cannot make new WAL entries during recovery
>> STATEMENT:  SELECT pg_catalog.setval('tab_jobs_id_seq', 31907, true);
> Hm, yea. setval() simply misses a check there (it was added for nextval
> though).
> I wonder if there are other functions bypassing the layers like
> setval/nextval?
>
> Trivial patch attached.

That worked - and I see has already been committed, thanks.

There is another small issue related to this dumping into a readonly slave:

With multiline columns (at least, I think that's the reason),
there are on STDERR endless occurrences of:

invalid command \N
and
invalid command \

There can be millions of these lines (obviously).

On top of that, the logfile gets appended
with 'syntax error', follwed by the whole dump:

ERROR:  syntax error at or near "18726" at character 1
STATEMENT:  18726	16883 [...] [whole dump follows here]

This does maybe not really qualify as a bug, but it does
seem unnecessary to spam a readonly standby with all
this. (come to think of it, 'syntax error' is a bit off in any case)


Thanks,

Erik Rijkers