Re: support for MERGE
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-01-10T15:36:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/10/21 2:44 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: > 5) WHEN AND > > I admit the "WHEN AND" conditions sounds a bit cryptic - it took me a > while to realize what this refers to. Is that a term established by SQL > Standard, or something we invented? The grammar gets it right but the error messages are nonsensical to me. I would like to see all user-facing instances of "WHEN AND" be replaced by the admittedly more verbose "WHEN [NOT] MATCHED AND". -- Vik Fearing
Commits
-
Doc fixes for MERGE statement
- 5dcebd10baa8 16.0 landed
- 5bb88967ed5c 15.0 landed
-
MERGE docs adjustments
- d6d1fbf353d1 15.0 landed
- 3d895bc846f2 16.0 landed
-
Link to MVCC docs in MERGE docs
- ffffeebf2447 15.0 landed
-
Fix EXPLAIN MERGE output when no tuples are processed
- 12e423e21d8e 15.0 landed
-
Make EXPLAIN MERGE output format more compact
- 598ac10be1c2 15.0 landed
-
Add support for MERGE SQL command
- 7103ebb7aae8 15.0 landed
-
Split ExecUpdate and ExecDelete into reusable pieces
- 25e777cf8e54 15.0 landed
-
Add API of sorts for transition table handling in trigger.c
- 3a46a45f6f00 15.0 landed
-
Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.
- 1cff1b95ab6d 13.0 cited