Re: Enable data checksums by default
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian
<bruce@momjian.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-10-16T06:54:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid BufferGetLSNAtomic() calls during nbtree scans.
- e6eed40e4441 18.0 cited
-
doc PG 18 relnotes: Add incompatibility note about checksums now default
- 48814415d5aa 18.0 landed
-
Fix pg_upgrade's cross-version tests when old < 18
- 38c18710b37a 18.0 landed
-
initdb: Change default to using data checksums.
- 04bec894a04c 18.0 landed
-
Allow TAP tests to force checksums off when calling init()
- e7d0cf42b1ac 18.0 landed
-
initdb: Add new option "--no-data-checksums"
- 983a588e0b86 18.0 landed
-
Tweak docs to reduce possible impact of data checksums
- efd72a3d422b 18.0 landed
On 14.10.24 11:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 03.10.24 23:13, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 11:15:02AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I have committed 0001 (the new option) and 0004 (the docs tweak). I >>> think >>> there is consensus for the rest, too, but I'll leave it for a few >>> more days >>> to think about. I guess the test failure has to be addressed. >> >> Here is a rebased patch with the test fix (for cfbot). I have made no >> other changes. > > I have committed the test changes (patch 0002). (I renamed the option > to no_data_checksums to keep the wording consistent with the initdb > option.) > > Right now, with checksums off by default, this doesn't do much, but you > can test this like > > PG_TEST_INITDB_EXTRA_OPTS=--data-checksums meson test ... > > and everything will pass. To make that work, I had to adjust the order > of how the initdb options are assembled in Cluster.pm a bit. > > I will work on the patch that flips the default next. The patch that flips the default has been committed. I also started a PG18 open items page and made a note that we follow up on the upgrade experience, as was discussed in this thread. https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_18_Open_Items