Thread

Using statement_timeout as a performance tool?

Mark Stosberg <mark@summersault.com> — 2007-02-01T14:10:09Z

Hello,

I'm working on setting up replication with Slony, and will soon have a
slave that a lot of SELECT traffic will be sent to (over 500k/day).

The primary query we need to run is somewhat complex, but seems to
complete on average in well under a second.

However, every so often (less in 1 in 10,000 queries) we'll see the
query take 2 or 3 minutes.

It's not clear why this is happening-- perhaps there is something else
going on that is affecting this query.

I'm considering the use of  "statement_timeout" to limit the time of
this particular query, to suppress the rare "run away", and avoid tying
up the processor for that additional time.

I think it may be better to give up, quit spending cycles on it right
then, and return an "oops, try again in a few minutes" message instead.
>From the data we have, seems like it has a strong chance of working again.

Is anyone else using "statement_timeout" as part of an overall
performance plan?

    Mark