Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server

Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "Andrey Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: "Ivan Bykov" <i.bykov@modernsys.ru>, "Kirill Reshke" <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-11-26T21:15:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2025-11-26, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> What happens if you replay the WAL generated with old binary, without 
> this patch, with new binary? It's not good:

Maybe this needs a new record identifier, separating old wal from that generated by the new code?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix test to work with non-8kB block sizes

  2. Fix setting next multixid's offset at offset wraparound

  3. Add test for multixid wraparound

  4. Set next multixid's offset when creating a new multixid

  5. psql: Improve tab completion for large objects.

  6. Refactor some repetitive SLRU code

  7. Transaction IDs wrap around, per my proposal of 13-Aug-01. More