Re: Online enabling of checksums
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-05T21:08:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 04/05/2018 02:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > No. See link above. > > Please don't use "we" in this childishness implying fashion. The term "we" was used on purpose because I too was annoyed and I was trying to be objective, non-combative and productive. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
Commits
-
Online enabling and disabling of data checksums
- f19c0eccae96 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Deactive flapping checksum isolation tests.
- bf75fe47e444 11.0 landed
-
Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel workers.
- cc5f81366c36 11.0 cited