Re: Areas for Solaris support modernization

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Greg Burd" <greg@burd.me> writes:
>> errfinish+0x288(1008310c9, 70f, 100832730, 100bff148, 100bff208, 0)
>> ...
>> aclitemout+0xf4(100cfa668, 1, 0, 100cfa10f, 100cfa600, 100cf9960)
>> FunctionCall1Coll+0x2c(100cfa120, 0, 100cfa600, 0, 100cfa10f, 7)
>> array_out+0x700(2, 0, 100cfa610, 100cfa650, 100cfa638, 0)
>> FunctionCall1Coll+0x2c(ffffffff7fffed00, 0, 100cfa5e8, 0, 100bff150, 2ef)
>> OidOutputFunctionCall+0x18(2ef, 100cfa5e8, 409, 100c01150, 100, ffffffff7fffed00)
>> InsertOneValue+0x2a4(100cfa058, e8, 1009a6f60, 100ccdb84, 40a, 100be5388)
>
> Oh ... you are running it at max debug level, aren't you.
> So InsertOneValue tries to print out the inserted value,
> and that doesn't work because I didn't hot-wire aclitemout
> for bootstrap mode, only aclitemin.

Hey Tom,

I'm not sure what "hot-wire" means, but I put a quick patch together that sets it to NULL when bootstrapping for now.  I'm building and testing now with the *three* patches, hopefully it'll complete in < 4hrs.

> I'm away on vacation, but will fix that when I return.
> In the meantime, backing down initdb's debug level to
> something less than DEBUG4 should get you past that.

Enjoy the vacation, please ignore me and this issue until you get back.  The tests might be done by then...

best.

-greg

> 			regards, tom lane