Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, walther@technowledgy.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-12-15T19:29:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 15.12.25 08:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else.
> 
> What to do now?  I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but
> I sure don't want to.  A stopgap measure to make the farm look
> green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts
> this output, but yech.  Thoughts?

I think that means that that gettext implementation is not currently 
supportable.  So either we revert our PRI* use except those two 
(unlikely), or those buildfarm members should disable NLS.