Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, walther@technowledgy.de,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-12-15T19:29:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 15.12.25 08:01, Tom Lane wrote: > So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else. > > What to do now? I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but > I sure don't want to. A stopgap measure to make the farm look > green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts > this output, but yech. Thoughts? I think that means that that gettext implementation is not currently supportable. So either we revert our PRI* use except those two (unlikely), or those buildfarm members should disable NLS.