Re: Code of Conduct plan
Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, James Keener <jim@jimkeener.com>,
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt@pivotal.io>,
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>,
Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
"pgsql-generallists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-09-16T04:00:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On 15/09/18 08:17, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, this. The PG community is mostly nice people, AFAICT. I'll be > astonished (and worried) if the CoC committee finds much to do. We're > implementing this mostly to make newcomers to the project feel that > it's a safe space. Agreed. However I think the all-of-life clause gives an open door to potential less than well intentioned new members joining up to extend a SJW agenda. So in fact the unintended consequence of this may be a *less* safe place for some existing members - unless all of their social media utterances are agreeable to the angry militant left. > It's also worth reminding people that this is v1.0 of the CoC document. > We plan to revisit it in a year or so, and thereafter as needed, to > improve anything that's causing problems or not working well. +1, At least this means we can address the above if it emerges as a problem regards Mark > > regards, tom lane >