Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-10T06:51:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 6/9/23 19:14, Tom Lane wrote: > David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes: >> Thank you, this was very helpful. I am able to get the expected result >> now with: > >> /* We only care about tables/views and can ignore subqueries, etc. */ >> if (!(rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION || >> (rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)))) >> continue; > > Right, that matches places like add_rtes_to_flat_rtable(). Good to have confirmation of that, thanks! >> One thing, though, rte->relkind is not set for views, so I still need to >> call get_rel_relkind(rte->relid). Not a big deal, but do you think it >> would make sense to set rte->relkind for views? > > If you see "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)", > it's dead certain that relid refers to a view, so you could just wire > in that knowledge. Yeah, that's a good trick. Even so, I wonder why relkind is not set when relid is set? Regards, -David
Commits
-
Retain relkind too in RTE_SUBQUERY entries for views.
- 0f8cfaf8921f 16.0 landed