Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>
From: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tattsu Yama <yamatattsu@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
robertmhaas@gmail.com, Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-09-17T03:30:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Alvaro! >>>> Is this fix strictly necessary for pg12, or is this something that we >>>> can leave for pg13? >>> >>> Not only me but many DBA needs this progress report feature on PG12, >>> therefore I'm trying to fix the problem. If you send other patch to >>> fix the problem, and it is more elegant than mine, I can withdraw my patch. >>> Anyway, I want to avoid this feature being reverted. >>> Do you have any ideas to fix the problem? >> >> I committed a fix for the originally reported problem as da47e43dc32e in >> branch REL_12_STABLE. Is that insufficient, and if so why? > > > Ooops, I misunderstood. I now realized you committed your patch to > fix the problem. Thanks! I'll test it later. :) > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=da47e43dc32e3c5916396f0cbcfa974b371e4875 I tested your patch (da47e43d) and it works fine. Thanks! :) So, my patch improving progress reporting API can leave for PG13. #Test scenario =================== [Session #1] select * from pg_stat_progress_cluster ; \watch 0.0001 [Session #2] create table hoge as select a from generate_series(1, 100000) a; create index ind_hoge1 on hoge(a); create index ind_hoge2 on hoge((a%2)); create index ind_hoge3 on hoge((a%3)); create index ind_hoge4 on hoge((a%4)); create index ind_hoge5 on hoge((a%5)); cluster hoge using ind_hoge1; =================== #Test result =================== 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|initializing|0|0|0|0|0|0 ... 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|rebuilding index|16387|100000|100000|0|0|0 <= Increasing from 0 to 5 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|rebuilding index|16387|100000|100000|0|0|1 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|rebuilding index|16387|100000|100000|0|0|2 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|rebuilding index|16387|100000|100000|0|0|3 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|rebuilding index|16387|100000|100000|0|0|4 22283|13593|postgres|16384|CLUSTER|performing final cleanup|16387|100000|100000|0|0|5 =================== Thanks, Tatsuro Yamada
Commits
-
Fix progress reporting of CLUSTER / VACUUM FULL
- da47e43dc32e 12.0 cited