Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@bluetreble.com>

From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2016-05-24T14:23:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 5/16/16 2:36 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Right.  I am thinking of writing some docs about how to avoid downtime
> for upgrades of various types.

If there's some magic sauce to shrink pg_upgrade downtime to near 0 I 
think folks would be very interested in that.

Outside of that scenario, I think what would be far more useful is 
information on how to do seamless master/replica switchovers using tools 
like pgBouncer or pgPool. That ability is useful *all* the time, not 
just when upgrading. It makes it trivial to do OS-level maintenance, and 
if you're using a form of logical replication it also makes it trivial 
to do expensive database maintenance, such as cluster/vacuum 
full/reindex. I've worked with a few clients that had that ability and 
it was a huge stress reducer. As a bonus, an unplanned outage of the 
master becomes far less stressful, because you already know exactly how 
to fail over.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461