Re: Reproducible GIST index corruption under concurrent updates
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com>,
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-01-20T22:26:12Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 20/01/2021 17:25, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >> Pushed as commit 6b4d3046f4, and backpatched down to version 12, where >> this bug was introduced. It will appear in the next minor release. > > I see you noted that REINDEX is required to repair any corrupted indexes. > For the purposes of the release notes, can we characterize which indexes > might be affected, or do we just have to say "better reindex all GIST > indexes"? Any GiST index that's been concurrently inserted might be corrupt. Better reindex all GiST indexes. - Heikki P.S. The GiST amcheck extension that's been discussed at [1] would catch this corruption, so if that was already committed, we could suggest using it. But that doesn't help us now. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF3eApa07-BajjG8+RYx-Dr_cq28ZA0GsZmUQrGu5b2ayRhB5A@mail.gmail.com would catch this corruption
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix bug in detecting concurrent page splits in GiST insert
- 0326635dd484 12.6 landed
- b8403d140f4e 13.2 landed
- 6b4d3046f422 14.0 landed
-
Refactor checks for deleted GiST pages.
- e2e992c93145 12.0 cited