Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Brian E Gallew <geek+@cmu.edu>
From: Brian E Gallew <geek+@cmu.edu>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-06-07T18:39:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > ... Another idea > is to send a signal to each backend that has marked a bit in shared > memory saying it has written to a relation, and have the signal handler > fsync all its dirty relations, set a finished bit, and have the > postmaster then fsync pglog. One other problem with signals is that things get complicated if PostgreSQL ever moves to a multi-threading model. -- ===================================================================== | JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. | | After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? | ===================================================================== | Finger geek@cmu.edu for my public key. | =====================================================================