Re: archive modules
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas
<robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>,
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Fujii Masao
<masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2022-09-22T11:54:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17.09.22 11:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 14.09.22 23:09, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Here is a patch that addresses this. >> >> My intent was to present archive_command as the built-in archive library, >> but I can see how this might cause confusion, so this change seems >> reasonable to me. > > While working on this, I noticed that in master this conflicts with > commit 3cabe45a819f8a2a282d9d57e45f259c84e97c3f. I have posted a > message in that thread looking for a resolution. I have received clarification there, so I went ahead with this patch here after some adjustments in master around that other patch.
Commits
-
Disallow setting archive_library and archive_command at the same time
- d627ce3b706d 16.0 landed
-
Restore archive_command documentation
- ba50834551f9 16.0 landed
- 5f56933ea5d5 15.0 landed
-
Doc: improve explanation of when custom GUCs appear in pg_settings.
- 44a51dc990cc 15.0 landed
- 857808a4116b 16.0 landed
-
doc: Add note about re-archiving of same WAL files in docs.
- 3cabe45a819f 16.0 cited
-
In basic_archive tests, insist on wal_level='replica'.
- 00c360a89c1a 15.0 landed
-
Allow archiving via loadable modules.
- 5ef1eefd76f4 15.0 landed
-
Move the code to archive files via the shell to a separate file.
- aeb4cc9ea07a 15.0 landed