Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile

On 2019-02-25 09:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-02-22 21:31, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2019-02-22 12:38:35 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 2019-02-19 18:02, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> But even if we were to decide we'd want to keep a volatile in SetLatch()
>>>> - which I think really would only serve to hide bugs - that'd not mean
>>>> it's a good idea to keep it on all the other functions in latch.c.
> 
>> Right. But we should ever look/write into the contents of a latch
>> outside of latch.c, so I don't think that'd really be a problem, even if
>> we relied on volatiles.
> 
> So how about this patch?

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services