Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>

From: "a.rybakina" <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, teodor@sigaev.ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Date: 2023-09-20T12:06:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible

  2. Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins

  3. Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP

  4. Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()

  5. Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

  6. Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching

  7. Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample

  8. Transform OR clauses to ANY expression

  9. MergeAttributes code deduplication

  10. SEARCH and CYCLE clauses

  11. Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.

  12. Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.

  13. Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.

  14. Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,

Hi!

When I sent the patch version to commitfest, I thought that the work on 
this topic was completed. Patch version and test results in [0].

But in the process of discussing this patch, we found out that there is 
another place where you can make a transformation, specifically, during 
the calculation of selectivity. I implemented the raw version [1], but 
unfortunately it didn't work in regression tests.

I'm sorry that I didn't write about the status earlier, I was very 
overwhelmed with tasks at work due to releases and preparations for the 
conference. I returned to the work of this patch, today or tomorrow I'll 
drop the version.


[0]

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4bac271d-1700-db24-74ac-8414f2baf9fd%40postgrespro.ru

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11403645-b342-c400-859e-47d0f41ec22a%40postgrespro.ru

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b301dce1-09fd-72b1-834a-527ca428db5e%40yandex.ru

On 20.09.2023 12:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 29.08.23 05:37, a.rybakina wrote:
>> Thank you for your interest in this problem and help, and I'm sorry 
>> that I didn't respond to this email for a long time. To be honest, I 
>> wanted to investigate the problems in more detail and already answer 
>> more clearly, but unfortunately I have not found anything more 
>> significant yet.
>
> What is the status of this patch?  It is registered in the commitfest. 
> It looks like a stalled research project?  The last posted patch 
> doesn't contain any description or tests, so it doesn't look very ready.
>