Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Hi! When I sent the patch version to commitfest, I thought that the work on this topic was completed. Patch version and test results in [0]. But in the process of discussing this patch, we found out that there is another place where you can make a transformation, specifically, during the calculation of selectivity. I implemented the raw version [1], but unfortunately it didn't work in regression tests. I'm sorry that I didn't write about the status earlier, I was very overwhelmed with tasks at work due to releases and preparations for the conference. I returned to the work of this patch, today or tomorrow I'll drop the version. [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4bac271d-1700-db24-74ac-8414f2baf9fd%40postgrespro.ru https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11403645-b342-c400-859e-47d0f41ec22a%40postgrespro.ru [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b301dce1-09fd-72b1-834a-527ca428db5e%40yandex.ru On 20.09.2023 12:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 29.08.23 05:37, a.rybakina wrote: >> Thank you for your interest in this problem and help, and I'm sorry >> that I didn't respond to this email for a long time. To be honest, I >> wanted to investigate the problems in more detail and already answer >> more clearly, but unfortunately I have not found anything more >> significant yet. > > What is the status of this patch? It is registered in the commitfest. > It looks like a stalled research project? The last posted patch > doesn't contain any description or tests, so it doesn't look very ready. >