Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>,
Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
torikoshia <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>, Atsushi Torikoshi
<atorik@gmail.com>, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
Evgeny Efimkin <efimkin@yandex-team.ru>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-23T10:04:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021/04/23 18:46, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:10 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2021/04/22 18:23, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:28:11AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >>>> >>>> I found another small issue in pg_stat_statements docs. The following >>>> description in the docs should be updated so that toplevel is included? >>>> >>>>> This view contains one row for each distinct database ID, user ID and query ID >>> >>> Indeed! I'm adding Magnus in Cc. >>> >>> PFA a patch to fix at, and also mention that toplevel will only >>> contain True values if pg_stat_statements.track is set to top. >> >> Thanks for the patch! LGTM. > > Agreed, in general. But going by the example a few lines down, I > changed the second part to: > True if the query was executed as a top level statement > + (if <varname>pg_stat_statements.track</varname> is set to > + <literal>all</literal>, otherwise always false) Isn't this confusing? Users may mistakenly read this as that the toplevel column always indicates false if pg_stat_statements.track is not "all". > (changes the wording, but also the name of the parameter is > pg_stat_statements.track, not pg_stat_statements.toplevel (that's the > column, not the parameter). Same error in the commit msg except there > you called it pg_stat_statements.top - but that one needed some more > fix as well) > > With those changes, applied. Thanks! Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
Clarify description of pg_stat_statements columns
- b4deefc39b93 15.0 landed
- 3b57d5af7435 14.0 landed
-
Fix wording in description of pg_stat_statements.toplevel
- f9e6d00df029 14.0 landed
-
Mention that toplevel is part of pg_stat_statements key.
- 7531fcb1fcf5 14.0 landed
-
adjust query id feature to use pg_stat_activity.query_id
- 9660834dd8bf 14.0 landed
-
Update copyright for 2021
- ca3b37487be3 14.0 cited
-
Take the statistics collector out of the loop for monitoring backends'
- b13c9686d084 8.2.0 cited