Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-02-08T21:58:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-02-08 We 10:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 07.02.23 19:28, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3*is* >> supported in these branches. There could be an argument for >> not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is >> also supported there. On the whole though, it seems more useful >> today for that test to pass with 3.x than for it to pass with 0.9.8. > > Ok, let's do it. Done cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Backpatch OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- 6133a0f4c7c3 12.15 landed
- cab553a08e2d 11.20 landed
-
OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- f0d2c65f17ca 13.0 cited
-
Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
- 7b283d0e1d1d 13.0 cited