Re: Proposal : Use bump memory context for temp buffers
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-12-16T13:51:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 16/12/2025 15:05, Daniil Davydov wrote: > Hi, > > Commit [1] introduced a new memory context suitable for situations when we > should allocate a large amount of memory with no need to free or reallocate it. > > I think that it will be useful for temp buffers : > 1) We allocate them lazily and never try to free them. > 2) Some users are very active in working with temporary tables, and as > a result, > they set large values for the "temp_buffers" parameter (several gigabytes). > > Thus, the use case for temp buffers seems to perfectly fit for bump > memory context. > What do you think? It makes no difference. The bump memory context is useful if you perform a lot of small allocations, because it skips the overhead of the chunk headers. In LocalBufferContext, we only ever make one allocation. - Heikki