Re: backup manifests
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.
- 05021a2c0cd2 13.0 landed
-
Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.
- 0a89e93bfaa6 13.0 landed
-
Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.
- 4db819ba4039 13.0 landed
-
Code review for backup manifest.
- a2ac73e7be7a 13.0 landed
-
Document the backup manifest file format.
- 149f2ae88ab0 13.0 landed
-
Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.
- c4f82a779d26 13.0 landed
-
Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.
- 1ec50a81ec0a 13.0 landed
-
Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test
- c3e4cbaab936 13.0 landed
-
Fix resource management bug with replication=database.
- 3e0d80fd8d3d 13.0 cited
-
Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.
- db1531cae009 13.0 cited
-
pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.
- 9f8f881caa0f 13.0 landed
-
pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.
- 460314db08e8 13.0 landed
-
Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.
- 0d8c9c1210c4 13.0 landed
-
Add checksum helper functions.
- c12e43a2e0d4 13.0 landed
-
pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.
- ac44367efbef 13.0 landed
-
Catversion bump for b9b408c48724
- afb5465e0cfc 13.0 cited
-
pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.
- 431ba7bebf13 13.0 landed
-
Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.
- 3cb646264e8c 12.0 cited
-
Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.
- f044d71e331d 11.0 cited
-
Logical replication support for initial data copy
- 7c4f52409a8c 10.0 cited
-
Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.
- 3dc2d62d0486 9.5.0 cited
-
Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.
- 5028f22f6eb0 9.5.0 cited
-
Remove support for 64-bit CRC.
- 404bc51cde9d 9.5.0 cited
-
Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.
- 21fda22ec46d 8.1.0 cited
On 4/2/20 1:04 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > There > are still some things that not everybody is happy about. In > particular, Stephen and David are unhappy about using CRC-32C as the > default algorithm, but Andres and Noah both think it's a reasonable > choice, even if not as robust as everybody will want. As I agree, I'm > going to stick with that choice. Yeah, I seem to be on the losing side of this argument, at least for now, so I don't think it should block the commit of this patch. It's an easy enough tweak if we change our minds. > For my part, I think this is a general issue that is not really this > patch's problem to solve. We have had multiple discussions over the > years about reducing the number of binaries that we ship. We could > have a general binary called "pg" or similar and use subcommands: pg > createdb, pg basebackup, pg validatebackup, etc. I think such an > approach is worth considering, though it would certainly be an > adjustment for everyone. Or we might do something else. But I don't > want to deal with that in this patch. I'm fine with the current name, especially now that WAL is validated. > A couple of other minor suggestions have been made: (1) rejigger > things to avoid message duplication related to launching external > binaries, That'd be nice to have, but I think we can live without it for now. > (2) maybe use appendShellString Seems like this would be good to have but I'm not going to make a fuss about it. > and (3) change some details > of error-reporting related to manifest parsing. I don't believe anyone > views these as blockers I'd view this as later refinement once we see how the tool is being used and/or get gripes from the field. So, with the addition of the 0004 patch down-thread this looks committable to me. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net