Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Date: 2026-06-03T23:40:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2026-06-03 19:36:29 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2026-06-03 16:03:20 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 12:57 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > On 2026-06-03 11:12:43 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > > > Are we certain that GitHub isn't going to opt them all into
> > > > test-every-stable-commit-and-PR on their next sync?
> > >
> > > It'd not test every stable commit, just the ones separately pushed, no?
> > 
> > Ah. Slightly embarrassing: I misunderstood the Sync Fork functionality
> > in GitHub, which I'd never actually used. It's a one-time
> > synchronization, not a permanent "keep this up to date" toggle, so the
> > situation's not as alarmingly carbon-intensive as I made it sound.
> > 
> > So yes, just every push. I don't know if the Sync Fork button acts as
> > a push trigger as well.
> 
> Jacob and I just tested this with a test account that I had around.  A new
> fork starts out with disabled workflows. But forking before this and then
> resyncing / pulling remaining changes, does lead to the workflow being
> disabled.

Err, I typo'd, thinko'd the last disabled, that should have been "enabled",
unfortunately.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. ci: Add GitHub Actions based CI

  2. ci: Remove support for cirrus-ci based CI