Re: Autovacuum / full vacuum

Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>

From: Michael Riess <mlriess@gmx.de>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-01-17T14:50:38Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Well,

I think that the documentation is not exactly easy to understand. I 
always wondered why there are no examples for common postgresql 
configurations. All I know is that the default configuration seems to be 
too low for production use. And while running postgres I get no hints as 
to which setting needs to be increased to improve performance. I have no 
chance to see if my FSM settings are too low other than to run vacuum 
full verbose in psql, pipe the result to a text file and grep for some 
words to get a somewhat comprehensive idea of how much unused space 
there is in my system.

Don't get me wrong - I really like PostgreSQL and it works well in my 
application. But somehow I feel that it might run much better ...

about the FSM: You say that increasing the FSM is fairly cheap - how 
should I know that?

>> did you read my post? In the first part I explained why I don't want
>> to increase the FSM that much.
> 
> No, you didn't.  You explained *that* you thought you didn't want to
> increase the FSM.  You didn't explain why.
> 
> FSM expansion comes fairly cheap  ...