Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory?
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>,
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us,
peter@eisentraut.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-08-08T08:42:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 08/08/2025 09:44, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 at 00:03, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >> That was not necessary for handleSyncLoss() to work, or for any other >> errors. If an error has occurred, PQgetResult() returns an error result, >> which is handled here. > > You're right. I think I simply forgot to remove that in v3 (it was > necessary for v2). I'd say let's remove that check and keep the error > path closer to the behavior in other places. Ok. I noticed that there's a similar, existing case in getNotify(), where libpq just hangs if an allocation fails. To simulate that, apply this change and use LISTEN/NOTIFY: --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-protocol3.c @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ getNotify(PGconn *conn) if (pqGets(&conn->workBuffer, conn)) return EOF; /* must save name while getting extra string */ - svname = strdup(conn->workBuffer.data); + svname = NULL; if (!svname) return EOF; if (pqGets(&conn->workBuffer, conn)) Returning EOF means "not enough data", which is wrong here just like in getBackendKeyData(). I'm not sure how to best fix that. If we can't process a Notify message because of out of memory, what should we do? a) silently drop the Notify messsage. b) report an error on the next query c) drop the connection with the error. You went with c) in getBackendKeyData(), which makes sense since that happens when establishing a connection. But Notify messages can be received at any time. b) is appealing, but I'm a little worried if we can manage the state correctly. Returning an error implies that the transaction is aborted, but since this error is generated internally in libpq, the transaction is not affected. I spotted one more case in pqSaveParameterStatus(): if the malloc() there fails, it just silently skips storing the parameter, so that a later call to PQparameterStatus() will not find it. That also seems bad. - Heikki
Commits
-
Revert unnecessary check for NULL
- 5a26a3e4eeb2 18.0 landed
- 807ee417e562 19 (unreleased) landed
-
libpq: Be strict about cancel key lengths
- e7ff96853ea7 18.0 landed
- e411a8d25a4b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
libpq: Handle OOM by disconnecting instead of hanging or skipping msgs
- 8aa287c9061b 18.0 landed
- f6f0542266f0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
libpq: Complain about missing BackendKeyData later with PGgetCancel()
- 42b1480eb2c6 18.0 landed
- a4801eb691ed 19 (unreleased) landed