Re: BUG #17723: cache lookup failed for type 0
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-12-16T19:36:27Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 12/16/22 18:10, Tom Lane wrote: > PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: >> This query: > >> WITH RECURSIVE > >> run(x, y) AS ( >> SELECT 0, 0 >> UNION ALL >> SELECT x, y FROM run AS r WHERE r.is_cycle >> ) >> CYCLE x, y SET is_cycle USING path > >> TABLE run >> ; > >> in which I mistakenly tried to access the is_cycle column from inside the >> wle, provokes the following error: > >> ERROR: XX000: cache lookup failed for type 0 >> LOCATION: typeOrDomainTypeRelid, parse_type.c:699 > > Yeah. We are calling addRangeTableEntryForCTE inside parse analysis of > the CTE's query, and it's generating a ParseNamespaceItem with p_vartype = 0 > because analyzeCTE hasn't yet identified the cycle_mark_type. That > eventually results in a Var with vartype 0, confusing later parse analysis. > > It looks to me like we can just move that part of the code up to before > we recurse to parse_sub_analyze, though. AFAICS, identification of the > cycle column type needn't (and had better not) depend on any > characteristics of the CTE's query. Indeed, it should only depend on the TO and DEFAULT subclauses (not shown here). Thanks for the fix! -- Vik Fearing
Commits
-
Fix inability to reference CYCLE column from inside its CTE.
- ea5ae4cae6a2 14.7 landed
- ae98debf77d4 15.2 landed
- 935277b24172 16.0 landed