Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Vadim Lakt <vadim.lakt@gmail.com>
From: Vadim Lakt <vadim.lakt@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-01-16T10:24:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix typo in test file name added in commit 4909b38af0.
- 50b8ad30f754 18.0 landed
- d96206f259d6 17.5 landed
- 9987c94662c2 16.9 landed
- 90bc4523fd47 15.13 landed
- bb1bc9fa962e 14.18 landed
- 4164d6976316 13.21 landed
-
Fix data loss in logical replication.
- 247ee94150b6 13.21 landed
- 4909b38af034 18.0 landed
- cadaf0ac4637 17.5 landed
- 9a2f8b4f01d5 16.9 landed
- 9f21be08e884 15.13 landed
- 0434033e8bb5 14.18 landed
-
Avoid invalidating all RelationSyncCache entries on publication rename.
- 3abe9dc18892 18.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete RECHECK keyword completely
- 7da1bdc2c2f1 18.0 cited
-
Backport BackgroundPsql perl test module
- 187b8991f70f 16.4 cited
Attachments
- err_logical_replication.zip (application/zip)
Hi, On 19.11.2023 09:18, Andres Freund wrote: > Yea, the situation is much simpler during logical decoding than "originally" - > there's no concurrency. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund > We've encountered a similar error on our industrial server. The case: After adding a table to logical replication, table initialization proceeds normally, but new data from the publisher's table does not appear on the subscriber server. After we added the table, we checked and saw that the data was present on the subscriber and everything was normal, we discovered the error after some time. I have attached scripts to the email. The patch from the first message also solves this problem. -- Best regards, Vadim Lakt